Thursday, January 26, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
A few days ago, an article appeared in the Hollywood Reporter. The headline read, "Bruce Springsteen's New Album Is His 'Angriest' Yet."
Bruce Springsteen is "liberal." When he goes off, self-described "conservatives" go wild. Laura Ingraham wrote a book called Shut Up & Sing: How Elites from Hollywood, Politics, and the UN are Subverting America. It was a best seller, even. I don't personally know anyone who actually read it, but that doesn't matter: When Bruce speaks out, there's inevitably a chorus of comments across the country: "Shut Up and Sing!"
Sometimes, it goes a bit further. In March, 2011, Springsteen wrote a letter to The Asbury Park Press, commenting on a story that had appeared in the paper 4 days earlier. The letter read, in part, "Thank you for your March 27 front-page story by Michael Symons. 'As poverty rises, cuts target aid.' The article is one of the few that highlights the contradictions between a policy of large tax cuts, on the one hand, and cuts in services to those in the most dire conditions, on the other."
The response didn't take long. The Governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, was gracious, though he avoided the substance of Bruce's letter, nevermind the substance of the Asbury Park Press article. The Trentonian blasted Bruce as a limousine liberal. But it didn't stop there. Within days, a Fox News New York report that had been filed a few weeks earlier was regurgitated, repackaged, and splashed in to many publications. It alleged that Bruce Springsteen was a "fake farmer" and a tax dodger.
While the initial report was slanted -- e.g, presenting liberal celebrities before large corporations using the same laws in the same way -- it did, at least, accurately point out that Springsteen's activities were perfectly legal, that he pays an annual 6-figure real estate tax bill, and that he actually does have an organic farm. The regurgitations, such as this one, didn't bother with the feigned fairness.
The Hollywood Reporter article began by quoting an "earwitness" who said, "He gets into economic justice quite a bit... It’s very rock 'n' roll." It didn't take long for the accusations of "hypocrite" and "fake farmer" to begin: Forget the message, attack the messenger!!
This brings me to Springsteen's new single, We Take Care Of Our Own. This song is angry. It is harsh. I think its presentation, its melodic simplicity, and even -- or maybe especially -- its lyrical structure are all reminiscent of Born In The U.S.A..
In the run-up to the release of the single, a friend of mine, perhaps sensing a rehash of some of what happened during the "Born in the U.S.A." era, wrote, "You are going to read and hear a great many distorted representations of this album."
I responded: "I think I'd rephrase that... as follows: 'You are going to read and hear a great many distorted representations of Bruce Springsteen.'... If there is a theme of 'economic justice,' as proposed in the opening of the Hollywood Reporter article, the response will be to portray Bruce Springsteen as a hypocrite and worse. The album itself will not be seriously addressed by those who would do the representing..."
In September, 1984, the conservative columnist George Will, in an op-en piece for The Washington Post turned "Born in the U.S.A." on its head, writing, "... the recitation of closed factories and other problems always seems punctuated by a grand, cheerful affirmation: 'Born in the U.S.A.!'"
It didn't take long for history to repeat. Already this morning, a piece in Los Angeles Times was titled, "First take: Bruce Springsteen's patriotic 'We Take Care of Our Own'" According to this misread, the lyrics "offer an affirmation of national glory," and "the title phrase borders on jingoism." Of the chorus, "We take care of our own/Wherever this flag is flown/We take care of our own," the piece concludes, without the barest hint of irony, that it's "about community and pride."
Perhaps "We Take Care of Our Own" really is unclear to some, in the way that "Born in the U.S.A." was a generation earlier. Both songs, ultimately, are a bit about reclaiming the flag.
In 2004 and 2008, Bruce Springsteen actively campaigned for the Democratic Party's nominee for President. Barack Obama campaigned behind the slogan, "Yes We Can." Springsteen debuted Working On A Dream at a campaign appearance for Obama just two days before the election.
No simple solutions are offered in "We Take Care of Our Own." For now, the song is one of bitterness, angriness, and is a reminder of who we supposedly were. Not, "We're all on our own"; in the end, it's as true as ever that "nobody wins unless everybody wins."
I love this song. I hope it has some impact. And I can hardly wait for the cries of "Shut up and Sing!" and "Hypocrite." It's about time.
The album, Wrecking Ball, will be released on March 6.